Headline: Nvidia’s AI Run Is Real — But Are Investors Pricing in Perfection?
Introduction: Nvidia’s profits have become the symbol of the AI boom, powering record data-center spending and market optimism. Yet beneath the headline numbers lies a harder question for investors: not whether Nvidia is profitable today, but whether its earnings power can endure against rising competition, shifting supply chains, and geopolitical pressure.
Nvidia’s valuation increasingly rests on the assumption that today’s momentum is permanent. Consensus projections lean on extraordinary growth, with revenue estimates around $360 billion by 2028—roughly 2.7 times 2025 levels and far beyond the $11 billion recorded in 2020. AI infrastructure build-outs may remain elevated for years, but the market appears to be extrapolating an investment super-cycle that doesn’t fade. This isn’t a dot-com-style debate about unprofitable business models; it’s a debate about durability.
The bigger leap is in margins. Current pricing suggests gross margins near 75% can persist long term—a rarity in high-end hardware. Such profitability is a magnet for margin-crushing competition from AMD, Intel, specialized startups, and hyperscalers building custom silicon. If rivals deliver “good enough” accelerators at lower price points, the industry’s pricing power shifts, and the premium compresses. With trillions in market value at stake, the incentive to attack Nvidia’s moat is enormous.
Two structural risks amplify that challenge. First, Nvidia relies on external foundries. If leading fabs decide to capture more of the value through higher pricing, that alone can pressure margins. Second, national strategies—particularly in China—are accelerating efforts to build competitive AI chips, even at minimal margins to gain share. Should such alternatives take hold, industry economics reset rapidly. At today’s levels, owning Nvidia is effectively a bet that the AI investment cycle doesn’t cool, gross margins remain elevated for years, competition struggles to catch up, and geopolitical ambitions fail to dent demand. That’s a tall order.
Key Points: – Market expectations hinge on sustained AI capex and revenue near $360 billion by 2028. – Valuation implies long-term gross margins around 75%—unusual for high-tech hardware. – Rising competition from AMD, Intel, startups, and hyperscaler custom chips threatens pricing power. – Dependence on external fabs introduces margin risk if foundries push through higher costs. – China’s strategic push for “good enough” accelerators at low margins could reset industry pricing. – Buying at current levels assumes a prolonged AI boom and limited competitive disruption.
