SBF’s defense attorney argues that the media, prosecutor, and judge’s rushed judgments contributed to SBF’s wrongful conviction. The lawyer contends that these entities acted hastily, impacting the fairness of the trial. According to the defense, the portrayal of SBF in the media created a biased environment that influenced public perception and judicial proceedings. The attorney emphasizes that the prosecution’s approach lacked thoroughness, leading to an unjust outcome. Furthermore, the defense claims that the judge’s decisions reflected this bias, undermining the integrity of the legal process.
This update was auto-syndicated to Bpaynews from real-time sources. It was normalized for clarity, SEO and Google News compatibility.
Last updated on November 4th, 2025 at 01:41 pm
