There are ongoing concerns over instances of “false rights protection and real extortion,” with the Tongzhou Plan viewed as offering a relief fund rather than true compensation. Critics argue that the approach taken by the Tongzhou Plan fails to adequately address the genuine needs of those seeking support. Instead of providing full compensation, the plan operates under the premise of distributing relief funds, which some believe undermines the concept of rightful restitution. This situation raises questions about the effectiveness and fairness of current policies regarding rights protection and financial assistance.
