SBF’s appeal hearing is set for November 4, focusing on a request for a retrial and claims of judicial bias against the original judge. The upcoming hearing underscores SBF’s contention that the initial trial was compromised by perceived bias from the presiding judge. His legal team argues that this bias affected the fairness of the trial and ultimately the verdict. If successful, this appeal could lead to a retrial, raising questions about the judicial process involved in the case. As the date approaches, both the defense and prosecution prepare for the arguments to be presented before the court.
